Iteration 1a: Tests

In this iteration, regular and irregular Voronoi grid coupled with different building types were tested extensively to understand the environmental implications of each strategy should they be chosen. The following are a quick run through of the various types tested

Superblock + Barcelona Courtyard Type

Superblock + Barcelona Courtyard Type
Figure: Superblock + Barcelona Courtyard Type
  • Percentage Good Windows: 10.9918
  • Percentage Good VF: 51.6432
  • Percentage Good SF: 85.655
  • Percentage Good PR: 100
  • Percentage Good DF: 47.0903
  • Percentage Good Building: 5.28736

Grid + Barcelona Courtyard Type

Grid + Barcelona Courtyard Type
Figure: Grid + Barcelona Courtyard Type
  • Percentage Good Windows: 8.85619
  • Percentage Good VF: 42.6957
  • Percentage Good SF: 87.5468
  • Percentage Good PR: 100
  • Percentage Good DF: 42.0251
  • Percentage Good Building: 4.77002

Voronoi + Barcelona Courtyard Type

Voronoi + Barcelona Courtyard Type
Figure: Voronoi + Barcelona Courtyard Type
  • Percentage Good Windows: 8.85619
  • Percentage Good VF: 42.6957
  • Percentage Good SF: 87.5468
  • Percentage Good PR: 100
  • Percentage Good DF: 42.0251
  • Percentage Good Building: 4.77002

Evaluation

Although voronoi grid introduces more turns and consequently a slightly more interesting street scape, it returns less value to this simulation when buildings are built to the edge of the plot. Daylight, view, and solar factor are all too low.

Iteration 1b: Instant Gratification

Linear N-S facing types Linear N-S facing types Distribution of types: yellow - Commercial; grey - Industrial

  • Distribution of types: yellow - Commercial; grey - Industrial

    Conceptually, Commercial and Industrial Buildings were mixed to possibly work as clean tech industrial towers with a possible mix of retail. Residential buildings are all made to be within walking distance of a clean tech tower. This is to simulate a city for clean tech workers.

Environment Evaluation 3d Iteration 1 Environment Evaluation Plan

  • Percentage Good Windows: 81.8129
  • Percentage Good VF: 96.5413
  • Percentage Good SF: 89.2467
  • Percentage Good PR: 100
  • Percentage Good DF: 92.7323
  • Percentage Good Building: 95.9677

These 32-storey (max), N-S facing towers prove to be effective in achieving good environment results. They allow the ground to be completely free up for activities and green space.

However, they look awfully boring.

In the subsequent iterations, I try to deviate from a uniform urban grain and rigid distribution of similar types.

results matching ""

    No results matching ""